Relationsumo#causes(sumo#process,sumo#process)the process in the 1st argument brings about the process in the 2nd argumenttype: pm#binary_predicate_typethe class of predicates relating two items - its valence is twotype: pm#asymmetric_relation_typean antisymmetric and irreflexive relationsupertype: pm#cause (pm#situation,pm#situation)see also rst#causesupertype: pm#before_situation (pm#situation,pm#situation)in WebKB, do not use these relations, use their inversessupertype: pm#relation_from_situation_to_situation (pm#situation,pm#situation) supertype: pm#relation_from_situation (pm#situation,*) supertype: pm#relation_from/to_thing_of_common_kind (*)this type permits to categorize relations according to their signatures and hence offers (i) a concise way to set essential exclusion relations, and (ii) a systematic and easy-to-follow categorizationsupertype: pm#relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with (*)type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_typesupertype: pm#relation_to_situation (*,pm#situation)in WebKB, prefer using relations "from" a situationsupertype: pm#relation_from/to_thing_of_common_kind (*)this type permits to categorize relations according to their signatures and hence offers (i) a concise way to set essential exclusion relations, and (ii) a systematic and easy-to-follow categorizationsupertype: pm#when_relation (?,?) supertype: pm#wh-/how_relation (*)this type permits to categorize relations according to the usual who/what/why/where/when/how questions ; this is a traditional but very subjective and ineffective way of categorizing relationssupertype: pm#relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with (*)type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_typesupertype: nsm#after (?,?) supertype: pm#binary_relation (?,?)in WebKB, most relation types are binary and some have a variable number of arguments (as in KIF), hence this type is currently only specialized by types that I do not want to see as direct subtypes of pm#relationsupertype: pm#relation_with_particular_property (*)this rather fuzzy type permits to group categorization schemes less common than those covered by the previous sibling categoriessupertype: pm#relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with (*)type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_typesupertype: pm#why_relation__whyrelation (*) supertype: pm#wh-/how_relation (*)this type permits to categorize relations according to the usual who/what/why/where/when/how questions ; this is a traditional but very subjective and ineffective way of categorizing relationssupertype: pm#asymmetric_relation (?,?)this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#asymmetric_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_typesupertype: pm#irreflexive_relation__irreflexiverelation (?,?)this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#irreflexive_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_typesupertype: pm#binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?) supertype: pm#relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (*) supertype: pm#relation_with_particular_property (*)this rather fuzzy type permits to group categorization schemes less common than those covered by the previous sibling categoriessupertype: pm#antisymmetric_relation__antisymmetricrelation (?,?)this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#antisymmetric_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_typesupertype: pm#binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?)