Relationpm#kind__type___class___instance_of__instanceof(?,rdfs#class)the '^' link in the FT notationinverse: pm#instance equal: rdf#type (pm) daml#type (pm) supertype: pm#relation_to_class (*,rdfs#class) supertype: pm#relation_to_set_or_class (*,pm#set_or_class) supertype: pm#relation_to_collection (*,pm#collection) supertype: pm#relation_from/to_thing_of_common_kind (*)this type permits to categorize relations according to their signatures and hence offers (i) a concise way to set essential exclusion relations, and (ii) a systematic and easy-to-follow categorizationsupertype: pm#relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with (*)type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_typesupertype: pm#what_relation (*) supertype: pm#wh-/how_relation (*)this type permits to categorize relations according to the usual who/what/why/where/when/how questions ; this is a traditional but very subjective and ineffective way of categorizing relationssupertype: pm#relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with (*)type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_typesupertype: pm#relation_to_type (*,pm#type) supertype: pm#relation_to_collection (*,pm#collection) supertype: pm#generalizing_type (?,pm#type)fuzzy category, DO NOT USE DIRECTLYsupertype: pm#partial_ordering_relation (?,?)this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#partial_ordering_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_typesupertype: pm#reflexive_relation__reflexiverelation (?,?)this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#reflexive_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_typesupertype: pm#binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?) supertype: pm#relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (*) supertype: pm#relation_with_particular_property (*)this rather fuzzy type permits to group categorization schemes less common than those covered by the previous sibling categoriessupertype: pm#relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with (*)type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_typesupertype: pm#antisymmetric_relation__antisymmetricrelation (?,?)this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#antisymmetric_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_typesupertype: pm#binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?) supertype: pm#transitive_relation (?,?)this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#transitive_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_typesupertype: pm#binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?) supertype: sumo#instance (?,sumo#set_or_class)if the common reading conventions of parameters had been respected, this type would have been named instance_of; an object is an instance of a set_or_class if it is included in that set_or_class; an individual may be an instance of many classes, some of which may be subclasses of others; thus, there is no assumption in the meaning of instance about specificity or uniquenesssupertype: dc#Type (?,pm#entity)to specify the nature or genre of the content of a resource; SHOULD NOT BE USED IN WEBKBsupertype: pm#binary_relation (?,?)in WebKB, most relation types are binary and some have a variable number of arguments (as in KIF), hence this type is currently only specialized by types that I do not want to see as direct subtypes of pm#relationsupertype: pm#relation_with_particular_property (*)this rather fuzzy type permits to group categorization schemes less common than those covered by the previous sibling categories