Relation sumo#deprives_norm (pm#thing,sumo#formula,sumo#objective_norm)  the 1st argument brings it about that the formula does not have the objective_norm
  exclusion:  sumo#confers_norm
  type:  pm#ternary_predicate_type__ternarypredicatetype  class of predicates that require exactly three arguments
  supertype:  pm#ternary_relation__ternaryrelation__ternary_only_relation (?,?,?)  relation with a fixed arity equal to 3; specialized by the SUMO ternary relations not categorized elsewhere
     supertype:  pm#relation_with_particular_property (*)  this rather fuzzy type permits to group categorization schemes less common than those covered by the previous sibling categories
        >part of:  pm#relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with  type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type


Another search (with same display options)?